Keeble v Hickeringhill
This is about beasts that are de ferae naturae
Keeble used tame ducks to entice wield ducks intoa trap.. He could then sell them. Hickeringhill fire dhis guna frw times to scare away the ducks.
Keeble won a case against the other for trespass. He was awarded the sum of 20 stelring
Hickerginhill fired the gun on his own land but towards Keeble”s land
Whhen someone dustrubs another land to reduce the landholders’s profit that is unlawful.
==========================
Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Ltd
This is about buying sheepkinss. This accompanied a loan This frsuatretd the mortgagor’s right to pay the loana dn be free of it.
Kreglinger land the defendannts 10 000 stelring. In return they must only seel sheespksin to him or if tey sodl any to another person they must pay Kreglinger a commission for it.
The Lords held that the otopj to buy sheepskin was separte form the laond. The rule against clogs n the equit of redemptio are there to prevent unsocnsnabel contratcs This was conscionable
There is no rule with there being extar conditions attahced to a mortgage so long as these conditojns are not too harsh.
Kreglinger won his case
===========================
============================
Calers's Blog 