he lives in California. den of iniquity. debating wizard. coveted ability to convince people
picked his constituency. gun nuts, Zionists, Christian evangelicals, free market fundamentalists, – these overlap.
not know for their cognition. critical faculties suspended.
his enemies bad too. he pours scorn on some liberal left pieties. for that I thank him.
but I do not warm to him. sneering, stuck up, mean spirited. delights in belittling people
do nothing about suffering and privation
though thoroughly dislikeable he could still be dead right
amass evidence and deploy effectualy to persuade people.
construct a cogent and logical argument.
vice. drugs. nude dancing. gays. immigration. black people Hispanics. children out of wedlock. abortion. minimum wage. wind turbines. gun control. sanctuary cities. higher taxes. schwarzneggar was a liberal republican.
but he lives there.
Ashkenazi name. knows a lot aboyt commie tyranny. other shapiro was Maozedong’s translator. read his editions of Chinese tales.
fallacy of many questions. machineguns his opponent with many complicated questions rather than defend his position or explicate his model
why not do this? explain to me why African-americans have children out of wedlock
lack of reply appears to vindicvate the questioner. not strictly germane.
come to the point.
logical fallacy is an argument that dupes many but is in fact unsound
shapiro s very experienced and seasoned debater.
existential fallacy. lambasted Obama for calling on Israel not to kill so many Palestinian civilians. ”a state has a right to defend itself”. universal premise. his particular conclusion – that Israel should not seek to reduce the number of civilians it kills. But Palestine killing illegal occupuing soldiers is terrorism.
from general to the particular.
”only a matter of time until one of these rockets hits an Israeli population centre.”
770 ktt h . CONSERvative radio. November 2016
trying to pack in as many logical fallacies as possible he can
thought terminating cliché socialism. knows his audiences. buzz words and trigger words
his claque will clap jeer or hoot on queue. the crowd has no critical faculuty
framing – associating something with
appeal to accomplishment. I went to Harvard. brainy chap does not mean we have to agree.
argument from authority.
appeal to wealth. I am handsomely paid so I am right.
if you have better uqalifications you get paid more. people with PhDs get less. hookers, drug dealers, sports starts singers get more.
not about qualifications
”is it the role to implement cosmic justice” how about pledge of allegiance ”with libery and justice for all.;’
cpourt law and justice.
absurdity in suggesting minimum wage is like saying he should get to be a basketball player. flippant. appeal to reidicule.
appeal to nature. minimum wage is unnatural. this is how economies work. economes are man made – we have rules. we have taxes and subsidies. governments intervene all the time. age limits banned products.
appeal to tradition . no mimumum wage in the past.
broken window fallacy. November 2016
against minimum wage. There will be costs but it not paying it means lost opportunity costs
not to obvious what is lost
minimum wage good for economy. not really because it impoverishes many.
circular reasoning. market determines wages – that is his conclusion. we have different abilities and there should be no minimum. he starts out with what he wishes to finish up with.
ignoration elenchi – irrelevant conclusion. market decides wages. not pertinent. SHOULD we have a minimum wage to give people a decent standard of living? SOmeone had to be lowest paid. some are talentless.
straw man argument. said govt should not try to create level playing field. government is not trying to introduce a level playing field as in eual wages for all
”I would never force an employee to work for a certain wage because that violates 13 the amendment and would be slavery” –
no one is talking about obliging a worker to work for a particular employer
goes on to say he would not force employer to pay a wage
false equivalanece. likens minimum wage to servitude. slavery on most of the world including many US states.
appeal to consequences. minimum wage would improve standard of living. he cannto contest that so he says it would increase joblessness.
appeal to consequences. if you have minumu wage it will raise rent and costs. unproven. unfalsifiable. have to build affordable housing, to raise taxes.
rpices go up anyway! real wages down.
same minimum wage debate.
slippery slope fallacy on wages – why not $100
no sense of proportion. reasonableness.
we know unreasonableness when we see it.
said low teenage employment in state of Washington. no casual link found
could be other reasons why teens in that state do not work much. rich parents, they are better paid in Washington, study more, chilling, hobbies, studying the bible or shooting.
appeal to ridicule 100 dollar minimum wage.
I will shapiro mr shapiro. if low wages are so wonderful why not 1 cent a centry? economic growth.
claims to want to see leftist policies implemented. but says he opposes them. self contradiction
why not introduce minimum wage all at once rather than phase it in? if they have such big profits. trying to make his opponents argument more hardline
economy is not a fixed pie. we are not hunter gatherers. we do not ebat each other with rocks.
contradiction in terms. forced altruism. capitalism – if I do not give you something that you want I will starve.
appeal to spite. socialism is selfish I shud get something for being alive.
cherry picking. disregard evidence which blows his argument out of the water – that minimum wag would have a deleterious effect on employment
minimum wage in many propserpus places lik Scandinavia Luxembourg, Monaco. UK. france.
magical thinking ABOLISH food stamps and wages will ”automatically increase”
belief that belieing it will make it happen
govt food stamps susbidies companies. food stamps not to employees of small business
my solution – give food stamps to all low paid!
no example of automatic increase. what if it doe snot work? starvation
argument from ignorance. claiming it is true because it has not been falsified.
argument from repetition. minimum wage eliminates jobs. repeated ad infintium so must be true.
red herring bill gates did so much good with inventions.
moyher Theresa did less good. sure she had less money.
overhweaming expceiton fallacy bill gates. he was richest man in the world.
survivorship bias. many business failed .
bill gates support minimum wag BTW
yes goods and services can help. make life better. but he does not want them to be affordable.
rich sometimes inherit wealth or provide harmful things like drugs, guns, alcohol, tobacco. pollution.
overlooks differential propensity to spend
$14 or $15 an hour will not make economy grow. it takes million in investment for products to make the economy grow. these 1 dollars add up.
it is often minerals makes it grow.
fallacy of a single cause. economic growth is due to inequality. not education , laws, minerals , land etc…
wrong direction. mistakes cause for consequences. says inequality causes economic growth. but economic growth increase inequality became the rich get rich a a fatsre rate than the poor are lifted out of poverty.
he says minimum wage favours large business . why do they sometimes oppose it then? if $ is all that matters.
wealth inequality causes economic growth. texas sharpshooter fallacy. there is a cluster of statiscs. that does not prove that it is interconnected. lower inequality in every other MEDC and in many of them high average wages and stringer economic growth.
inductive fallacy -instantly assuming that income gap causes economic growth inventions and good services. scant evidtnail basis for that.
appeal to stone – suggesting claim is ludicrous without proving it is so. The claim ebing that unequaluty causes poverty. take 1 dollar frm a billionaire and give to a womanw ith nothing tat reduces poverty and inequality.
income inequality at Walmart does not cause poverty. could be true but a vacuous truth. does not show that a minumim wage is bad.
false distinction – not a problem of equality a problem of poverty.
pooh argument ”you might say that workers of the world are uniting” suggest argument does not merit proper discussion
misleading vividness. appeal to emotion. guys with guns coming to your house. shocking and violent images. irrelevant to minimum wage. he is pro gun. he likes Israeli soldiers breaking into Palestinian family homes. facts do not care about your feelings.
proving too much. if guys with guns is a valid rationale for opposing this law then no laws should exist since ultimatelt they might all have to be enforced by police
false analogy or false comparison. left says a gay couple should wed . consent matters. but consent does not mater when workers and employer agree a contract
employer can have millions of workers. husband is not an employee.
pay everyone the same and nationalize all businesses. straw man and reduction ad absurdum.
states without minimum wage S Carolina, alabama, Louisiana. tennessee
below avager minumu gerogia.
special pleading. 2003 articule calling for Christians and muslims to be forcibly removed from Israel
he demands an exception to the general rule that citizens are allowed to reside in their counttry
does nit justify this. Israel a jewish state. he tells us the US is Judeo-Christian. does not want muslims to be booted out of US despite thinking they are bad.
does not call for ethnic minority citizens to be removed form any other country.
spot my logical fallacies.