A v Secretary of State for the Home Dept number TWO

Standard

Eight applicants were certified as a threat to public security in 2001. They were locked up on the word of the Home Secretary. The security services had given him information leading him to believe that these men should be detained.

The Special Immigration Appeals Commission looked at the certificates. It determined whether each person was a risk to public security.

The SIAC must act on lawfully obtained info

the utilisation of torture obtained info in a ticking bomb situation os acceptable but not for legal proceedings

use of information arising from inhumane treatment is forbodden for two reasons

  • the infomaiton is suspet
  • it is inherently unethica;

Therefore the information has to be disregarded.

 

Advertisements

About Calers

Born Belfast 1971. I read history at Edinburgh. I did a Master's at UCL. I have semi-libertarian right wing opinions. I am married with a daughter and a son. I am allergic to cats. I am the falling hope of the not so stern and somewhat bending Tories. I am a legal beagle rather than and eagle. Big up the Commonwealth of Nations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s