Page 126. Law of Property. Activity 8.6

Standard

Read Goldberg v Edwards make notes on the relevant facts, decisions and reasoning, then answer the following questions;

Edwardds permitted Goldberg to access Goldberg’s annex throuugh Edwards’ house. Then the house was let too someone else who locked it and would not permit Goldberg to come through. It turned oout Goldberg had an easement.

section 62 with the conveyance turned the licence into an easement.

———————————————————————————

a.        Why did Goldberg ‘s claim for an easement under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows falls?

——————————————————-

b/    How did Mr Goldberg win the case?

———————————————————————

c            What should the landlord have done in both Wright v Macadam and Goldberg v Edwards to prevent an easement arising on the grant of a second lease?

=======================================

About Calers

Born Belfast 1971. I read history at Edinburgh. I did a Master's at UCL. I have semi-libertarian right wing opinions. I am married with a daughter and a son. I am allergic to cats. I am the falling hope of the not so stern and somewhat bending Tories. I am a legal beagle rather than and eagle. Big up the Commonwealth of Nations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s